Jim
Rogers, Jr. is an American businessman, investor and author. He is currently
based in Singapore. Rogers is the Chairman of Rogers Holdings and Beeland
Interests, Inc. He was the co-founder of the Quantum Fund and creator of the
Rogers International Commodities Index (RICI).
Erico
Tavares: Jim, thank for being with us today. We would like to talk about water
and other agricultural inputs, something you have been very vocal about in
recent years
To
set the stage for today’s topic, a few years ago we worked on a biofuels
project which took us all around the world. In a trip to Bolivia a pioneering
Austrian engineer involved in the sector told us something very interesting. At
that time the price of vegetable oils was much cheaper than diesel, prompting
many people to start building biofuels facilities across Europe. He said this
was crazy and in no way sustainable because crude oil is and always will be the
lowest common denominator in an economy.
Water Wars Inevitable |
Jim
Rogers: Water is one of the great opportunities of our times. If you look at
the world there are some huge shortages developing in some parts but there is
also a lot of water in other parts, just in the wrong place – like water in
Siberia for instance, which is not where most people are.
There
are going to be wars in the Middle East over oil east of the Red Sea, but west
of that there will be wars over water since there are serious water problems in
that region. We will also have problems in the western parts of the US with the
depletion of a big aquifer, from what I read.
So
we have a lot of water problems in a lot of places. California is making the
news right now, but that is not the only place at risk. And if you can figure
out ways to clean or transport or pump water you are going to do very well.
ET:
Let’s focus on China first, a country you know well. There are reports that a
vast proportion of their pure water resources is contaminated, an unfortunate
outcome of their rapid industrialization process. Do you have a view on the
situation there? Is the Chinese government starting to address the issue?
JR:
China has got gigantic water problems. First they have the water in the wrong
place and second the water is filthy, terribly polluted in many cases. So the
Chinese know that and they are spending a lot of money trying to figure that
out. So someone is going to make a lot of money in China helping them to solve
their own water problems.
That’s
the opportunity right now. Figure out how to get the water from the wrong place
to the right place, clean it up and you can get very rich.
ET:
We have been involved with companies that are developing innovative ways to do
just that. However, one recurring issue is cost. Water ends up being much more
expensive once you treat or transport it. So do you think we could actually
face some constraints on how to improve access to that resource despite the
significant opportunity?
JR:
There is no question that we are facing constraints. They are already here in
many parts of the world. Water, I presume, is going to get very expensive or
else we are going to move to where the water is. This is how societies and
civilizations have developed. Once upon a time there was a lot of farming in
the Sahara desert that we now know of. It is now a desert and everybody moved
away because there is no more water there.
Water
is the single most important determination of civilization. I travelled around
the world a couple of times and I have seen whole societies that disappeared
because the water disappeared. People can survive recession and war, revolution
and famine, plague, but they cannot survive without water. That ends the whole
story, no matter how smart you think you are.
We
have to move or it becomes very expensive, but you have to move because you got
to have the water.
ET:
Well here in Singapore it rains quite a bit so you guys might do OK.
JR:
Actually Singapore is one of the most advanced places for solving water
problems, because they have to. They recycle water, figured out ways to capture
the water. One of the worries is that if they go to war with Malaysia that
would be the end of the story, because Malaysia would just cut off the water.
Fortunately, they are not at war and Singapore has been hard at work – I
believe that we are now 90% self-sufficient, but still, you got to have the
water.
ET:
India has been one of the very bright spots in the emerging markets sector
lately. Food is obviously very important there, given its weight on disposable
income and so forth. A food security professor told us that he recently flew
over a large agricultural area there, and salty spots were starting to become
very apparent as a result of over-drainage from underground reservoirs. Once
salt takes over those lands become unproductive, and this is being reported in
other areas as well. Are you aware of this issue? More broadly, is food prices
one of the things you track when considering investing in an emerging economy?
JR:
To repeat, if you don’t have water you can’t make it. I’m wildly bullish on
China but if they don’t solve the water problem there’s no China story.
Likewise India has a water problem, worse in fact. There’s no question that
India will be in worse shape than China. Northern India has gigantic problems.
And that’s a nation of a billion people. Add another 1.3 billion in China and
you have a big water problem.
There
are great opportunities in water. I haven’t found one that is publicly listed
as of yet. I am sure there are several, I am just too lazy to find them. But I
would love to find water plays that are substantial and serious.
The
problem with water is that you can’t own it. Because if you do, when the crisis
comes the politicians will hang you in the public square because you are
exploiting Man’s God given right to water. And they will curse and scream at
you. But if you find a way to solve the water problem they will build a monument
for you. You will be very, very rich. But for goodness sake don’t own the water
because if you do they will take it away from you, torture you and execute you.
ET:
It looks like California might have yet another dry year ahead. As we all know,
the Golden State produces an incredible amount of all varieties of food, which
will be impacted if they don’t start getting a lot of water soon. Major
reservoirs are already at extremely low levels, and we may be seeing a
reversion to a much drier period which actually has been prevalent over the
last 1000 years in that region. Is this something that concerns you, not only
as an American but also looking at global food supplies as a whole?
JR:
The whole Southwest is facing a serious water problem. The aquifer, based on
what I read, is drying up out there. And not just in California but all over
the Southwest. And if that happens America will have to absorb a gigantic
change. If you have water and productive land you will be very, very rich.
Because whether we like it or not – now this is not going to happen next year,
I don’t think California is going to become a desert any time soon – it is a
process which is going on, from what I can read.
And
from what I can see nobody in the government seems to know or care about it.
The government of California is learning but they are not solving the problem,
they are deliberating about the problem. But again it is just not the US, there
many places in the world with problems – China, India, the Middle East, many
places have big water problems.
ET:
Switching gears a bit, you are also a director of a fertilizer company. Do you
see constraints developing on that side of the equation going forward?
JR:
Well, we all read the same thing, that the supply of phosphorous, which is a
vital fertilizer, is not unlimited and will run out at some point in the
future. I’m a director of a phosphorous fertilizer company.
This
is another reason for people to learn about farming and agriculture. You can
farm without fertilizer, people have done that for a long time. But it is less
efficient and if you start having phosphorous problems, fertilizer problems and
water problems then, my God, there are 7 billion people in the world and there
haven’t always been 7 billion people in the world. We may have gigantic changes
again.
Civilization
shifts again. Not might, we will. This is something that has been going on
since the beginning of time. If you see where Mankind has lived over the
centuries, I mentioned the Sahara, you mentioned California. There will be
great investment opportunities; but longer term there are staggering
implications.
ET:
You have spoken about the advanced age of many farmers in key countries around
the world, such as in the US, Canada, Great Britain and Japan. The demographics
in this sector look particularly appalling. What needs to happen so that young
people start getting more interested in this activity? Technology development?
Higher prices? Do you see a shift occurring here in all your discussions around
the world?
JR:
There is very little shift. Farming has been a terrible business for 30 years.
And when that happens people go to where the money is. They go to Wall Street,
wherever the money is.
In
America the average age of farmers is 58 because nobody wants to be a farmer
anymore. There are farms in Japan that are empty because there is nobody to
farm them; they are even experimenting bringing in workers from China, and they
don’t like foreigners at all but they have little choice. The average age in
Australia is 58. Canada has the oldest age for farmers in recorded history. In
the UK the highest rate of suicide is in agriculture. I guess we all know that
millions of Indian farmers commit suicide because things are so terrible.
More
people in America study public relations than agriculture, because it has been
a terrible business. The only that is going to change is for it to become very
profitable and for young people to see the farmers getting rich. Of course they
will say “those guys are driving Lamborghinis and I want one too so I will
become a farmer”.
But
it’s not going to happen until it becomes an exciting and profitable business.
The Soviets tried to make people farm, they had all these coops or whatever
they called them; Mao Tse Tung tried the same thing and eventually ruined
Chinese agriculture by forcing people to become farmers. It doesn’t work.
The
only way it works is for people to become motivated to become farmers and that
will only happen when they get rich. There have been many periods in history
where farmers got rich and powerful. It will happen again.
ET:
Given all the issues that we have discussed, if these trends persist we will
see higher food prices, perhaps significantly so. How can people hedge against
this? Should they start growing their own food, purchase the appropriate
securities in the markets, buy water treatment companies…?
JR:
That’s why you should become a farmer. Buy some land and become a farmer if you
like the outdoors. Otherwise you can lease it to a farmer. Make sure you buy
land where it is going to rain and that you lease it to a competent farmer,
otherwise you will suffer.
There
are many ways. You can invest in seed companies, or you can become a tractor
salesman, or set up restaurants for the farmers because they will have a lot
more money down the road. Buy yourself a second home by a lake in the farm
belt, in the places where the farmers are going to be.
There
are many ways to participate and to get involved – to hedge if you will.
Becoming a stockbroker is not the best way. Farming is the way of the future.
But don’t do it unless you like it. If you don’t like it you will find out it’s
a lot of hard work and will go broke, like many other farmers. Certainly many
have gone broke, committed suicide and so forth over the last 30 years.
Instead
you can become a journalist covering the farming sector. Depends on what your
skills and interests are. As you look at your life, figure out a way to orient
it towards agriculture. If you want to sell, sell something to the farmers.
ET:
A quick comment on possible macro implications. The US Federal Reserve excludes
food from its core inflation definition, but if prices rise quickly there could
be repercussions on the rest of the economy. It seems that Western central
banks have spent so much time and effort printing money to avoid deflation that
when they finally start getting inflation, driven by a food crisis or any other
shock, they will be in a very weak position to tackle it. For one, raising
interest rates will put a lot of pressure on government finances given the huge
debt loads that they are now carrying. What do you think could happen here?
JR:
Throughout history we have had economic slowdowns every four to seven years,
every so often. Always have, and always will. Nobody has solved that problem,
not even the central banks. We are going to have another one in the world. We
are going to have more I should say, and they will get worse because the debt
situation is higher and higher. We hear all this talk about austerity and
cutting back but every country in the world has higher debt now than it had
last year and will have higher debt next year.
The
buildup of debt in the US alone is staggering; Japan is staggering, everywhere
is staggering. So the next time we have an economic slowdown it is going to be
much worse than the last time, and if the world survives that one, the one
after that is going to be worse and worse.
Because
as you point out, if interest rates go higher – and they will; this current
level of interest rates is not only abnormal but absurd, it has never been so
low anywhere in the world – with the gigantic amount of debt we are going to
have gigantic problems worldwide: more turmoil, we will probably have wars,
governments fail, countries fail. This is going to be a mess.
So
buy yourself a farm. Be prepared! It’s going to be a serious mess. And
hopefully your farm will be far away from the marauding hordes.
ET:
Final question. You are also known as the “investment biker”, after driving
thousands of miles around the world. Is this how you have generated your best
investment ideas, being on the ground and seeing what was actually happening?
These days, how do you keep close tabs on the markets?
JR:
I drove around the world not for investing but for adventure. Because of who I
am, when I go some place I do look around, I do observe. And in my travels I
would see opportunities just by the nature of who I am. If I saw something
changing I would pursue it.
And
that’s a good way to do it. If you have the time and the money to go around the
world in a car or a motorcycle do it. It’s a great adventure, at least for me.
I’ve done it twice. The investing was a sideline.
But
just walking down the street, if you can be observant you can find investment
ideas. Sometimes I missed them but other times not, and I capitalized on it.
And I read a lot. I don’t know much about basketball but I know what’s going on
around the world because I read and that’s my passion.
Start
with what interests you. Find the changes in the industry you like and figure
out ways to invest and profit from it. This will you put you ahead of Wall
Street because this is your passion, so you can get in before anybody else. You
can also get out sooner, because Wall Street is always late in getting out.
Over
the course of your life you can spot 25 or so good investment opportunities.
Concentrate your efforts on understanding them rather than jumping around and
you will do very well.
ET:
Jim, thank you very much for sharing your knowledge on these important topics.
We’ll go drink some water and eat an apple while they’re still cheap!
JR:
All the best to you.
Reprinted
with permission from Zero Hedge.
No comments:
Post a Comment